Moon Hoax- The Lies In Your Visors-Addendum

Search Tags:

Categories:

Moon Hoax- The Lies In Your Visors-Addendum

Uploaded by: greenmagoos
Video Description:
http://s532.photobucket.com/albums/ee321/MikeStMark/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Cope http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fried_(album) Close inspection of images by Michael St Mark reveals strange shaped "suns" reflected in Apollo Astro-nots visors while allegedly on the Moon! Comparison with "real" Suns reflected in the visors of STS and Gemin
i Astros shows a marked difference!

Tags for this video: 9/11 aldrin apollo buzz conspiracy hoax jfk kubrick lunar moon space sts svector thebadastronomer ufo

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by greenmagoos

Related Videos

UFO during moon eclipse	Apollo 11: The TV Transmission Conspiracy Theorists Hate!	Apollo Moon Hoax? Spotlights, Fall-off, Camera Angles

Moon Hoax- The Asstro-not Don't Give A F*** About UV!	Moon Hoax - One Six G.	Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

(1) "How did they ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

(1) "How did they do this without tracking?"
Very simple my boy, they sent out a signal in the general direction of the craft. Since the signal was in the HF wavelength and not in the visible light wavelength (such as a laser), the signal went out into space in broad field. Because the signal was directed at, but not concentrated at one ge
neral object, the signal lost power, but not so much power as to be renderred a waste.

(2) Sought of like ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

(2) Sought of like when you are on the road, driving away from your favorite radio broadcast station...depending on the amount of power sent out, the signal fades until it becomes lost.

(3) Furthermore, ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

(3) Furthermore, the spacecraft themselves were equipped with onboard automatic guidance systems that approximated their relative position to the control center, based on their distance from the planet or moon.
This is why most of them ended in failure.

(4) Have not you ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

(4) Have not you ever heard NASA complain about how it was to send the probes to other planets?
Their favorite metaphor was, "It like shooting an arrow at a soda can in the next county".

Hey look mommy, ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

Hey look mommy, it's stars! And they said that didn't remember seeing any.
Your own website that your cited clearly shows stars at low earth orbit. Next, you are going to tell that this was an artist rendition. h t t p : / / w w w . a s t r . u a . e d u / k e e l / s p a c e / a p o l l o 8 s l a a r t . j p g

Those photographs ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

Those photographs don't prove anything, because they could be picture of anything.
They don't show the Apollo spacecraft. They do show a rocket of some sought heading off into space. Come on now, you didn't really think that I'd be that gullible, did you? OMG!

"Faking the moon ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

"Faking the moon rocks would be even harder, as mere surface appearance wouldn't be enough."
I keep telling you that they sent unmanned probes to the Moon to do all soughts of experiments. They aint gonna tell you everything if their primary goal is to deceive a nation and the world. That's why they call it a secret.

Despite what you ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

Despite what you may have heard or read, rocks, whether they be from the moon, mars, venus, jupiter, or wherever, come in all forms, shapes, and sizes.
Once telemetry was received from the unmanned probes, they could have made up any old dumbchit about the composition of the moon rocks. Futhermore, the rocks, once their composition was learned, could have been fabricated or found here on Earth, processed in a chamber and then released to the pub
lic as infomation.

"Now how do you ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

"Now how do you fake a painting if you don't even know what it looks like? Faking the moon rocks would be even harder, as mere surface appearance wouldn't be enough."
That's just it. NASA is in the faking business. That's like asking me to provide proof of UFOs, even though I know I have seen them, photographed them, and what you. But still the proof is not definitive. You want me to believe that they went to the Moon, then show me definitive proof, like
sun spokes in their visor.

No. you CLAIM they ... ( 4 days ago by loperspest)

No. you CLAIM they are in the faking business. DO you have proof? Your broad sweeping hand waving tactics ignore the fact that Soviet samples match Apollo in pertinent details. Such as an extreme lack of moisture, a greater and more perfect beads, signs of cooling in low gravity, signs of eon long term exposure to cosmic rays and micrometeorites, a lack of water eroded clay and sand particles. E-mail the Russian embassy or one of their science institutes, if you don't believe me.

Your telling me, ... ( 4 days ago by loperspest)

Your telling me, but you have no proof. They did send probes. But do you have proof of a sample return probe by NASA? Or of a lander with the extremely sophisticated instruments that would have been needed (and I don't think were available at that time) to study the structure so minutely in situ that the rocks could be reconstructed from that information? You can't say the proof of the hoax is the hoax, you actually have to prove it's existence.

Yes, it is. It's a ... ( 4 days ago by loperspest)

Yes, it is. It's a painting of the Apollo 8 CSM breaking free of the SIVB third stage of the Saturn V rocket. Since that was a flight with a working CSM only, there is no way that could be anything but a painting. There was no one to show that point of view. Artists take liberties. What next? Your going to tell me Picasso's Guernica is a hoax, since people don't really look like that. spacetoday [.] org/images/SpcStns/Soyuz/SoyuzTM16 [.] jpg That there is a photograph,, and there is no stars.

(1) In summary, ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

(1) In summary, five Surveyor spacecraft landed successfully on the lunar surface. Four of these examined widely separated mare sites in the Moons equatorial belt. The fifth investigated a region within the southern highlands. Four spacecraft survived the extreme cold of the lunar night and operated for more than one day/night cycle.

(2) In total, the ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

(2) In total, the five spacecraft operated for a combined elapsed time of about 17 months, transmitted 87,000 pictures, performed 6 separate chemical analyses of surface and near-surface samples, dug into and otherwise manipulated and tested lunar material, measured its mechanical properties, and obtained a wide variety of other data that greatly increased our knowledge of the Moon.

"The only mission ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

"The only mission that was within a 'few meters' of an Apollo landing site, was Surveyor 3 and Apollo 12."
Now you know that's a laughfer. The Apollo 11 astronauts claimed to have actually walked over to the surveyor, and picked up its camera. Bottom line: the signals sent back from the moon...laser earth distance test, rock composition, etc, were all from the surveyor spacecrafts.

Ask yourself a ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

Ask yourself a simple question.
Why send all of those suveyor unmanned landing probes only to send a manned expedition to those same locations? Do the math. That's like doing double the same work. Makes no sense, except to fake a manned moon landing.

It makes perfect ... ( 4 days ago by loperspest)

It makes perfect sense considering that it was a perfect way to find out the results of long term exposure to a lunar environment. The camera was brought back for analysis by, I repeat, Apollo 12. Also, the science that could be done in situ by a lander of that time, was quite primitive compared to the years of study possible on the 10's of kilograms of samples brought back by a manned mission.

Again you are ... ( 4 days ago by loperspest)

Again you are showing your ignorance 'my boy'. I own the National Geographic that covered Apollo 11, and no such claim was made. Look in apolloarchive [.] come, no photos of a Surveyor lander are found under Apollo 11. However, there was a mission sent o a site, as I already said, but it was Apollo 12. Not Apollo 11. Which, again, did not setup a laser reflector. No astronomer sends a pulse to that landing area. Ask any astronomer world wide yourself.

Yes, yes they did. ... ( 4 days ago by loperspest)

Yes, yes they did. These facts on this wonderfully successful robotic lander series though have nothing to do with the verification, for or against, the validity of Apollo.

"I own the National ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

"I own the National Geographic"
Man you really are disillusioned. Poor chap!

Whatever. Your ... ( 4 days ago by loperspest)

Whatever. Your still are making an ignorant mistake if you think that it was Apollo 11 that was said to have brought back the Surveyor 3 camera.

Composition of ... ( 4 days ago by fanbutton)

Composition of surface materials was also determined from data obtained by the alpha-scattering instrument. This instrument was carried by Surveyor 5, 6, and 7 to allow chemical analysis of the lunar surface material. The performance of the alpha-scattering equipment and operational system during the three missions was excellent. In all, six lunar samples were examined.

Chemical analysis, ... ( 4 days ago by loperspest)

Chemical analysis, yes. But that tells you nothing about the physical structure. All things that the Soviet samples revealed, and the Apollo rocks matched. Impossible without actual samples brought back to Earth.

well NASA is ... ( 3 days ago by VertigoHeadSpin)

well NASA is telling us before that they love music..."fly me to the moon" lol..

Tell a friend:

Filme YouTube

Vino si distreaza-te alaturi de noi! Filme YouTube Best of !

Moon Hoax- The Lies In Your Visors-Addendum

URL
Embed Code- add this media to your site